On September 13, the property management in Juyuan Community, Xiaogan City, Hubei Province publicly apologized to the cat owner Ms. Liao, and said that the security guard involved had resigned and would learn from a lesson to prevent similar inciden...
On September 13, the property management in Juyuan Community, Xiaogan City, Hubei Province publicly apologized to the cat owner Ms. Liao, and said that the security guard involved had resigned and would learn from a lesson to prevent similar incidents from happening again. Previously, the community owner Ms. Liao, who had been with the Garfield cat for six years, was complained by neighbors for running out of the door and was violently expelled and killed by security guards as pregnant wild cats. They hung the cat's body on the side door of the community on the grounds that "the cat has 9 lives and is afraid that the cat will be resurrected."
The reason why the cat was hanged after violently killing the cat was actually "afraid of the cat being resurrected"? With such superstitious and absurd behavior and such cold means of dealing with things, how can the owner be "safe" and how can his life be "safe"?
Killing cats and hanging corpses in public, people's "sensibility" is still intolerable. As a cat owner, Ms. Liao has raised a cat for 6 years. Once she ran out of the door, she was killed. The cat's body was even hung on the door for public display. Whether it is a pet of the owner or a relative who is with him day and night, how can he accept it emotionally? As the people who show their opinions, they see the "thunderous means" of the community property, and only the "cold" remains in the hearts of the people for a long time. How can you live "safe" if you kill cats in anger, expose corpses when superstitious, and lack respect for life?
Killing cats and hanging corpses in public, "rationality" needs even more reflection. The property should apologize, but it is not to "rest and settle the matter" for the sake of face. The property should apologize for failing to pay attention to the interests of the owners and for failing to regulate the security team. When I received a complaint from an owner, I found that it was "suspected stray cat". The property's first reaction was not to go to the owner group to ask if it was raised by other owners, nor to transfer the cat to a safe place to wait for claim, and no one claimed it after more than the time, but to kill it as a wild cat "once and for all". Moreover, can the wild cat be beaten to death directly? It is related to the emotional concerns and interests of the owners. It is difficult to call it "humanized" when the property team handles it like this. After being beaten to death, the cat was hanged in public because of superstition that "afraid of cats being resurrected". There is such a person in the security team, which is difficult to call it "standardized".
The property should act, but it is by no means just posting two posters to "please Ms. Liao's emotions." Property should standardize the property management service team, strictly control recruitment, improve the moral quality and emergency response capabilities of property personnel, and also improve the communication and coordination mechanism with owners. The property has the right to manage the community, but this right comes from the owner. The owner handes over the relevant management rights to the property to exercise and pay remuneration, and the property also needs to be responsible to the owner. The right to drive a property should be limited. When dealing with issues involving the interests of the owners, whether the methods and means are moderate, whether they are in line with public opinion, and whether they truly protect the interests of the owners, you must consider more and communicate smoothly.
The security guard who kills cats and hangs his corpse cannot be "security" for the owner's physical and mental health. Only by truly protecting the interests of the owner and protecting the dignity of life can one place be kept "safe" and "safe".
