In the first round of the Champions League stage, Chelsea lost to Bayern 1-3 away. Before Chelsea scored a goal, Bayern central defender Jonathan Ta knocked down Joao Pedro, and after the goal, the tower was given a yellow card, but Chelsea coach Mar...
After the game, the reporter asked whether Tat should have a red card, and Maresca said: "To me, this is obviously a red card. I have said that in the Premier League, too, if a player's intention is not to grab the ball, but just to play the opponent's player, then why not a red card?"
"The referee told me that because the movements are not fierce enough or invasive. But no matter what, you tried. So, to show the players a red card, will they see blood? Or do you see something happening? If the player's intention is clear, it is a red card. So for me, this is no dispute."
In response, Kratenberg said: "Chelsea thinks that Jonatan Ta should be sent off when he knocked João Pedro near the center line. However, there is no malice in this defense. , excessive force or violent behavior means that the only behavior that may constitute a red card can only destroy obvious goal opportunities. "
" Considering the distance between the incident and the goal and the possibility of a backup defender, the incident is unlikely to meet the red card judgment standard. Therefore, the referee's decision to present a yellow card is correct. "
" It is worth noting that the 'intention' has long been removed from the rules of the game. The referee now needs to judge the defensive action based on factors such as strength, maliciousness, speed, etc., or whether it has destroyed the obvious goal opportunity. "
" In this case, the defensive action did not meet any of the above criteria, so it is not appropriate to present a red card. Maresca's post-match remarks may reflect more of his dissatisfaction with the game results and the team's performance, rather than his objection to the referee's penalty."
